Explore process diagnostics, governed AI adoption, supervised document automation and incremental modernization through illustrative scenarios for Canada and international projects.
The interactive journey below follows one governed AI adoption example, from initial assessment to decision records. The browser check compares fictional records with preserved references.
Illustrative example with fictional data. The organization, addresses and volumes do not represent a real client.
01
Input · shadow-scan · compatible sources
Start with the logs you have.
This example starts with seven days of proxy logs. Shadow-scan fit depends on the available sources and the product documentation.
Traffic to AI services helps build an inventory of tools, departments and frequency. Logs are signals for investigation; they do not establish the content sent.
The team and client review contracts, workflows and possible personal information to classify uses. This is a human, contextual assessment, not an automatic regulatory conclusion from traffic.
OutputUses prioritized for human review
Illustrative human assessment
High
HR documents in an assistant without a contractPossible personal information; contextual review required.
High
Leadership meetings in an external servicePotential strategic information.
Medium
Development API use without reviewReview code and test data.
Low
Queries without attachments in the corporate assistantBased on the contract and conditions in this example.
04
Decision · Client AI committee
An owner and a decision for each use.
The committee decides whether to allow, allow with conditions or block each use. In this example, every decision has an owner, rationale and date.
OutputDecisions documented by the committee
Block
Uploads to assistants without a contract
AI committee · October 8, 2026
Allow with conditions
Corporate assistant with single sign-on
AI committee · October 8, 2026
Review in 30 days
Development API use
CTO · October 8, 2026
05
Control · DezoTech team + client IT
Put the decision into practice.
The team and client IT implement the example rules, with single sign-on and human review of exceptions. A rescan helps assess the effect.
OutputIllustrative policy and rescan
AI-use-policy-v1 · example
AllowCorporate assistantSingle sign-on required
BlockUploads to unapproved servicesRules implemented by IT
ReviewExceptions through the AI committeeWithin 2 business days
RescanOctober 8 to 150 uploads to unapproved services
06
Evidence · SHA-256 verification in your browser
Compare with a preserved reference.
Each record is checked individually against its preserved seal. Change record 2’s summary: that record diverges and the set becomes inconsistent. Later records are not rebuilt.
OutputIntegrity checked relative to preserved seals
Calculating SHA-256 in your browser…
Record 1 · discovery
…
14 AI services identified across 6 departments; 3 with file uploads.
IT / Security
Previous reference
000000000000…00000000
Preserved seal
bdd66a12f77a…9f64e0a9
Calculated now
…
View record data
{
"seq": 1,
"ts": "2026-10-06T14:02:11Z",
"tipo": "discovery",
"origem": "proxy logs, September 29 to October 5",
"resumo": "14 AI services identified across 6 departments; 3 with file uploads.",
"responsavel": "IT / Security",
"hash_anterior": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
}
Record 2 · decision
…
Uploads to assistants without a contract: block. Corporate assistant: allow with single sign-on.
AI committee
Previous reference
bdd66a12f77a…9f64e0a9
Preserved seal
5b2a009e13c7…223ec90a
Calculated now
…
View record data
{
"seq": 2,
"ts": "2026-10-08T17:30:00Z",
"tipo": "decision",
"origem": "AI committee meeting minutes",
"resumo": "Uploads to assistants without a contract: block. Corporate assistant: allow with single sign-on.",
"responsavel": "AI committee",
"hash_anterior": "bdd66a12f77afece5a4dd8b3a023378b88e1bd30df7589780d293c589f64e0a9"
}
Record 3 · control
…
Proxy policy active. Rescan: 0 uploads to unapproved services.
Trust conditions: reference seals must be kept separately and obtained from a trusted source. If records and seals are replaced together, this comparison cannot establish the integrity of the original. SHA-256 alone does not authenticate an author or date. This demo does not send or save any example data.
How each service starts with the process.
These are illustrative scenarios, not client outcomes. They describe inputs, review and outputs to assess in a project; they do not run OCR, integrations or migrations on this page.
Process diagnostics and intelligence
Illustrative input
Fictional requests, service steps and records of handoffs between teams.
Planned review
The team checks the workflow, exceptions and assumptions. A baseline must be measured in a real engagement.
Expected output
A process map, dependencies and a prioritized opportunity, with criteria for testing an improvement.
Public sector is the priority in Brazil. For Canada and international projects, the initial focus is professional services, distribution, logistics and manufacturing. The applications below are possibilities to assess against data, language and local requirements.
Financial services and healthcare require specialist assessment. The proposed starting point is administrative work; sensitive financial decisions and clinical decisions fall outside this scope.
Which workflow in your organization is worth testing?
Describe how the work happens, which documents and systems are involved and who validates the result. The conversation helps define an assessment or pilot suited to your context.
